🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our kids' childhood". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," stated the MEP driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely happening at the local level amid country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.